Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Trailways, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WINNER, Chief Judge.
This Title VII case was assigned to Judge Finesilver, but, because he was unable to finish a jury trial, at his request and with my consent the case was reassigned to me for trial. The issue is whether a “no beard” policy of Trailways violates Title VII.
The parties agree that this is a disparate impact case rather than a disparate treatment case. That being so, proof of a discriminatory motive or intent on the part of defendant is not necessary, and the test is whether the challenged practice has a discriminatory effect. Dothard v. Rawlinson, (1977) 433…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. SweeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lowell Staats Mining Co. v. Pioneer Uravan, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1986
- Richardson v. Quik Trip Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1984
- Trailways Lines v. Trailways, Inc. Joint CouncilDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985
- Johnson v. Memphis Police DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1989
- Bradley v. Pizzaco of Nebraska, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.