Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Pizzaco of Nebraska, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 21, 1991No. Nos. 89-2271, 89-2272PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FAGG, Circuit Judge.
Langston Bradley brought this disparate impact case against Domino’s Pizza, Inc. and Pizzaco of Nebraska, Inc. (collectively Domino’s) claiming his discharge for failure to comply with Domino’s no-beard policy violates Title VII because the policy discriminates against black males. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) (1988). The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) intervened seeking injunctive relief on behalf of other black males adversely affected by Domino’s no-beard policy. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-4(g)(6). The district court concluded Bradley and the EEOC failed to establish a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Raymond MacDissi v. Valmont Industries, Inc., Raymond MacDissi v. Valmont Industries, Inc., Raymond MacDissi v. Valmont Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Langston Bradley, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Intervenor Below) v. Pizzaco of Nebraska, Inc. D/B/A Domino's Pizza, and Domino's Pizza, Inc., Langston Bradley, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Intervenor Below) v. Pizzaco of Nebraska, Inc. D/B/A Domino's Pizza, and Domino's Pizza, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991