Legal Opinion

Ad Hoc Committee of Holders of Trade Claims v. PG&E Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 14, 2020No. 4:20-cv-01493Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AD HOC COMMITTEE OF HOLDERS OF Case No. 20-cv-01493-HSG TRADE CLAIMS, 8 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR Appellant, LEAVE TO APPEAL 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 3 10 PG&E CORPORATION, et al., 11 Appellees. 12 13 Pending before the Court is the motion of the Ad Hoc Committee of Holders of Trade 14 Claims (“Trade Committee”) for leave to appeal (Dkt. No. 3-2, “Motion for Leave”), pursuant to 15 28 U.S.C. Section 158(a)(3) and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8004(a), the Interlocutory 16 Order Regarding Postpetition Interest (BR Dkt.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Raleigh v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  4. Couch v. Telescope Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. SaxenaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API