Legal Opinion

Caicedo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 6, 1989No. B14-88-524-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEARS, Justice.

A jury convicted Hugo Paredes Caicedo, appellant, of the aggravated kidnapping of William Sanchez. In five points of error appellant claims (1) he was denied a speedy trial; (2) the evidence was insufficient to show that appellant did not voluntarily release his victim in a safe place, and (3) the trial court erred in submitting the issue of voluntary release of the victim without proper definition and without proper application of the facts to the case. We affirm.

In 1987 William Sanchez was living in Houston and was making his living selling cocaine with his partner…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. James W. Harlow, Charles E. Wilson and Thomas F. Addy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  4. Lawrence v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Randle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Jason Alexander Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  3. State v. KuriCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Celestine v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  5. State v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API