State v. Kuri
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DRAUGHN, Justice.
This is an appeal by the state from a dismissal for lack of a speedy trial. Appel-lee, an attorney, was indicted for the offense of delivery of a controlled substance, cocaine. The Honorable Norman Lanford granted Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of a Speedy Trial, holding that appel-lee was denied a speedy trial in violation of the U.S. and Texas Constitutions. The state in three points of error contends Judge Lanford erred by failing to properly apply the constitutional standards for a speedy trial to the facts of this case. We reverse and remand.
The right to a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Webb v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Jason Alexander Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Griffith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1998
- Celestine v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.