Legal Opinion

State v. Kuri

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 14, 1993No. C14-91-00432-CRPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRAUGHN, Justice.

This is an appeal by the state from a dismissal for lack of a speedy trial. Appel-lee, an attorney, was indicted for the offense of delivery of a controlled substance, cocaine. The Honorable Norman Lanford granted Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of a Speedy Trial, holding that appel-lee was denied a speedy trial in violation of the U.S. and Texas Constitutions. The state in three points of error contends Judge Lanford erred by failing to properly apply the constitutional standards for a speedy trial to the facts of this case. We reverse and remand.

The right to a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Webb v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Jason Alexander Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  4. Griffith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1998
  5. Celestine v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API