Jackson v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Indictment for assault with intent to murder. Before Judge Richard H. Clark. Fulton superior court. March term, 1898.
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed.
Haralson & Gowdy, for plaintiff in error. O. D. Hill, solicitor-general, contra.
Jackson moved for a new trial on the general grounds; because the court erred “in admitting in evidence three other indictments then standing against the defendant, he never having been tried thereunder and the defendant’s character not having been put in issue by himself,”, and “in allowing the solicitor-general to comment to the jury on other indictments against defendant, introduced in evidence over defendant’s objection.” This is all the motion discloses on this subject. The brief of evidence…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Henderson v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Berry v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Fluker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Zanes v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Benepe-Owenhouse Co. v. ScheideggerMontana Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.