Legal Opinion

Berry v. Brunson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 13, 1928No. 6537PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

Does the answer of the defendant set up a cause of action against the plaintiffs? After denying the allegations of the petition, the defendant seeks to set up and enforce an implied trust in her favor, arising from the payment, with her money, of a part of *529the purchase-price of the land. She alleges that she turned over to Jack Berry $250 to pay upon the purchase-price when the land was bought by him, relying upon Berry to take a deed thereto in her name, but that instead of taking the deed in her name he took the same to himself. She does not allege that…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Eastlick v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Estill v. Citizens & Southern BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Lindquist v. DicksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Moore v. McKinleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  5. Hall v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Lefkoff v. SicroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. SaulSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Rabun v. WynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Hemphill v. HemphillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API