Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Turner v. Marshall

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1931No. 22350PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Tinder the ramification of the social and business interests conceded to exist between the judge of the court of common pleas and the defendants in the four actions covered by this record, any one, whether consciously or unconsciously, would have a natural inclination to prejudge the several cases. It is of vital importance that the litigant should believe that he will have a fair trial. The facts set forth and conceded by the affidavits were sufficient to justify the plaintiffs in believing that they might not have such a trial. The writ will be allowed.

Writ allowed.

Jones, Matthias and…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. BayerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Cuyahoga County Bd. of Mental Retardation v. Association of Cuyahoga County Teachers of the Trainable RetardedOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. In re Disqualification of WinklerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Camburn v. CamburnOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In re Disqualification of HooverOhio Supreme Court · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API