Legal Opinion

State v. Port of Bay City

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1913PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From Tillamook: Percy R. Kelly, Judge. This is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto by the State, on relation of George Watt, against the Port of Bay City, a pretended quasi municipal corporation, and others. Decree in favor of respondents, and relator appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice McBride.

This is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto, brought to test the validity of the organization of a port corporation, created under the provisions of Chapter 3, Title XXXXI, L. O. L., and called the Port of Bay City.

1. The facts are as follows: In 1909 the citizens in the vicinity of Nehalem Bay, which is situated north of Tillamook Bay, organized a port under the provisions of the chapter cited, the south boundary of which was placed practically upon the summit of the range of mountains which separates Nehalem Bay from Tillamook Bay, and included all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SengstackenOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Wright v. City of McMinnvilleOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hogaboom v. EhrhardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Port of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  2. School District No. 17 v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Witham v. McNuttOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Hamilton v. RudeenOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Smith v. HurlburtOregon Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API