Legal Opinion

Chancy Park Land Co. v. Hart

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 31, 1898PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Clinton District Court. — Hon. P. B. Wolfe, Judge. Action to foreclose a contract for the sale of a city lot Decree as prayed, and defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

In the early part of 1892, W. H. Pearce, J. H. Dnnham, and. A. P. Barker engaged in the enterprise of inducing the Iowa. Packing Company to erect a pork-packing and beef-killing plant at Clinton, Iowa, and in order to obtain a site therefor, and to pay a bonus, entered into a contract with O. H. and Mary M. Aller and Lura M. Hall for the purchase of ninety-six acres of land, with the condition that the grantors should plat the west sixty acres into lots and streets, and execute an agreement for the conveyance of lots therein, at the price of three hundred 'dollars each, to purchasers, as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hull v. . RugglesNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Yellow-Stone Kit v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. Wilkinson v. . GillNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Cross v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  5. People v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. State v. HundlingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  3. Burks v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Dorman, Et Vir. v. Publix-Saenger-Sparks Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
  5. McCleary v. ChipmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API