Legal Opinion
Fullman v. Potter
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 28, 2007No. Civil Action 05-1352PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Andrew Fullman, proceeding pro se, 1 alleges that the United States Postal Service discriminated against him based on his race, color and sex, and engaged in retaliatory discharge in violation of Title VII after it terminated him for failing to disclose, as required by the employment application, that he was previously employed by the Postal Service and terminated for dishonest conduct. The Court is now faced with the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. As the Defendant has pointed to an absence of genuine issue of material fact…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Susan Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company Nabisco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marley v. DonahueDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Bloch v. Mack Trucks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Ma v. Nucor-Yamato Steel CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022