Legal Opinion
Bertone v. Wormington (In re Wormington)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 12, 2016No. Case No. 16-10248-JDL; ADV. 16-1047-JDLPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Janice D, Loyd, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
Before the Court is the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”) [Doc.13], the Objection to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Objection”) [Doc.17] and the Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendant’s Objection to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc.18]. Plaintiff, Frank Bertone (“Bertone”), seeks a determination that his claim for damages against Kyle David Wormington (“Debtor”) arising from Debtor’s battery upon him is non-dischargeable pursuant to *796Bankruptcy Code §…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Burris v. Burris (In re Burris)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019
- Burris v. Burris (In re Burris)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2018
- Christ Center of Divine Philosophy, Inc. v. ElamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022
- Ford, Jr. v. LandonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2020
- Ford, Jr. v. LandonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.