Plankinton v. Nye County
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in determining that he was precluded from raising the issue of irregularities in the creation of the unincorporated town of Pahrump in this action in order to enjoin the enforcement of a township ordinance. Appellant has cited no relevant authority in support of his contention. Since error has not been affirmatively demonstrated, the judgment is affirmed. Holland Livestock v. B & C Enterprises, 92 Nev. 473, 553 P.2d 950 (1976).
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Holland Livestock Ranch v. B & C ENTERPRISESNevada Supreme Court · 1976
4Cited by10 opinions
- Butler, Crockett & Walsh Development Corp. v. Pinecrest Pipeline Operating Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- Wilson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Bennett v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandNevada Supreme Court · 1982
- Iama Corp. v. WhamNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Cooper v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.