Legal Opinion
State v. Van Buren
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 5, 2004No. 30237-3-IIPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
98 P.3d 1235 (2004)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Albert Earl VAN BUREN, Appellant.
No. 30237-3-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
October 5, 2004.
Jennifer Anne Irvine Forbes, Kitsap County Prosecutors Office, Port Orchard, WA, for Appellant.
Thomas E. Weaver, Attorney at Law, Port Orchard, WA, for Respondent.
QUINN-BRINTNALL, C.J.
Albert Earl Van Buren appeals his exceptional sentence imposed after he entered an Alford[1] plea to two counts of third degree rape of a child, RCW 9A.44.079, a class C felony, and one count of third degree rape, RCW 9A.44.060, also a class C felony.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. AlvaradoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. AlvaradoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. HantonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.