Legal Opinion
U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sharef
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 19, 2013No. 11 Civ. 9073(SAS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) commenced this action against Uriel Sharef, Ulrich Bock, Carlos Sergi, Stephan Signer, Herbert Steffen, Andres Truppel, and Bernd Regendantz (“defendants”), former senior executives at Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (“Siemens”), a multinational engineering and electronics conglomerate headquartered in Germany. The SEC alleges four causes of action: (1) violations of Section 30A of the Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); (2) violations of Section 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act;…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Banco Bradesco S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- In re Braskem S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Das v. Rio Tinto PLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Baliga ex rel. Link Motion Inc. v. Link Motion Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Cunningham v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.