Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 27, 2021No. 23/20PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jamel Clark v. State of Maryland No. 23, September Term 2020 Criminal Law – Sentencing – Merger of Convictions – Required Evidence Test. A conviction for the crime of possession of an assault weapon does not merge into a conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted drug felon under the required evidence test, even though both convictions are based on possession of the same weapon. Maryland Code, Criminal Law Article, §§4-303, 5-622. Criminal Law – Sentencing – Merger of Convictions – Rule of Lenity. The rule of lenity is used as a last resort when the ordinary tools of statutory…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Government Employees Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. State v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Abeokuto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. 110OAG40, Maryland Attorney General Reports2025
  2. Dept. of Pub. Saf. & Corr. Serv. v. FentonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  3. Logan v. DietzCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  4. Logan v. DietzCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  5. Maryland Attorney General Opinion 110OAG40, Maryland Attorney General Reports2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API