Arnold v. . Estis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
AcxiON for the recovery of land, tried at Spring Term, 1884, of Granville Superior Court, before McKoy, Judge, and a jury- There was a verdict and judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.
The land in controversy formerly belonged to Chesley Arnold, the father of the plaintiff and feme defendant, under whom both parties undertake to derive title.
On August 10th, 1874, Chesley Arnold executed a deed conveying the land to the defendants for the recited “consideration of his natural love and affection for the said Nancy H. Estis, his daughter, and in consideration of marriage between the said Lucas E. Estis and his said daughter,” accompanying which the said Lucas E., as a further consideration of the conveyance, not expressed in the deed, entered into a bond to the said Chesley,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crummen v. . BennetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
- Wilson v. . PattonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Duvall v. . RollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- Mebane v. . LaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Gaster v. . HardieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tucker v. . SatterthwaiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Hughes v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Long v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Rankin v. . ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- McCanless v. . FlinchumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.