Legal Opinion

Cahto Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria v. Dutschke

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 15, 2013No. 11-17847PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAWKINS, Senior Circuit Judge:

This case touches on critical and sensitive issues of tribal membership that are generally beyond our review.because “[a] tribe’s right to define its own membership for tribal purposes has long been recognized as central to its existence as an independent political community.” Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49, 72 n. 32, 98 S.Ct. 1670, 56 L.Ed.2d 106 (1978). This matter comes to us under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”). The Cahto Tribe of the Laytonville Ranchería (“Tribe” or “Cahto Tribe”) 1 seeks to set aside a decision of the Bureau…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Humane Society of the United States v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Lewis v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Sauer v. United States Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Albert Alto v. Kenneth SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Tiffany Aguayo v. S.M.R. JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Winnemucca Indian Colony v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API