Legal Opinion

Handley v. Mortland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1959No. 34463PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*491Ott, J.

February 23, 1945, Paul Handley, aged nine, was struck and injured by a truck belonging to Pacific Highway Transport, Inc., which was being driven by Charles Mortland.

Four months later, Hazel Anderson (an aunt and now Paul’s foster mother) was appointed his guardian ad litem, and, on the same day, June 14, 1945, she commenced an action against the transport company and Charles Mort-land to recover damages for Paul’s injuries. The transport company and Mortland answered the complaint, denying liability and affirmatively pleading contributory negligence. Thereafter, the guardian ad litem…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Maxwell Land Grant & Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Buob v. Feenaughty MacHinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Burke v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Dearing v. Speedway Realty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Ombrello v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Haller v. WallisWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Riemer v. St. Clare's Riverside Medical CenterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  3. State v. Gomez-FlorencioCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. Rasmussen v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API