Morris v. Barker
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
In this action on an injunction bond, plaintiffs had judgment. Defendant brings error.
Plaintiffs were vendors and one Marr and his wife purchasers in a land contract of land in Detroit, the price being $62,000; $5,000 paid down. Vendors instituted proceeding .for possession before a circuit court commissioner, and had judgment. Writ of restitution issued. The Marrs filed bill for rescission, to enjoin further proceedings in the law action, and for other relief. ' The injunction issued. Defendant became surety on the bond. 3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12667 (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 14355). The conditions…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eureka Iron & Steel Works v. BresnahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Sauer v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Lothrop v. SouthworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- Ombrello v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Workers' Compensation Agency Director v. MacDonald's Industrial Products, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Kirby v. MeierMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- In Re Meier EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1963