Legal Opinion
Speed v. Mills
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 30, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1368PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Third party plaintiff Bobby Mills has sued the District of Columbia Government (“the District”), seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for the alleged taking of certain real property in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Mills seeks declaratory relief, mandamus, unspecified damages, and attorneys’ fees. Before the Court are the District’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (“Def. Mot.”), Mills’ Response (“PI. Resp.”), and the District’s Reply (“Def. Reply”). 1 For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coleman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Continental Resources v. FairNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
- Jiggetts v. CipulloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Household Fin. Realty Corp. of Nev. v. BalkenbushNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- Jiggetts v. CipulloDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.