Legal Opinion
Werrmann v. Aratusa, Ltd.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 27, 1993PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
266 N.J. Super. 471 (1993)
630 A.2d 302
CHERYL WERRMANN AND GEORGE WERRMANN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
ARATUSA, LTD., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, AND R. BRUCE HILL AGENCY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 12, 1993.
Decided July 27, 1993.
Before Judges HAVEY, STERN and BROCHIN.
William M. Feinberg argued the cause for appellants (Feinberg, Dee & Feinberg, attorneys; Mr. Feinberg on the brief).
Mary L. Cole argued the cause for respondent (O'Meara & Hight, P.C., attorneys; Ms. Cole on the brief).
The opinion of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Hill v. YaskinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Carter Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Emar Group, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Kimball Intern. v. Northfield MetalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Napier v. BertramArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- SATEC, INC. VS. THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC VS. PATRICK SPINA(L-0799-12, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
- Exxonmobil Oil Corp. v. Black Stone Petroleum Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.