Legal Opinion

People v. Viduya

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 24, 1985No. 83SA48PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOHR, Justice.

Roger Wayne Viduya appeals his conviction for vehicular homicide. See § 18-3-106, 8 C.R.S. (1978). 1 Because the trial judge applied the wrong legal standard when concluding that statements made by Viduya to the police were constitutionally obtained and admissible at trial, we reverse and remand with directions to hold a new hearing on that issue. We affirm all the other challenged rulings of the trial court.

I

At approximately 10:00 p.m. on February 6, 1981, a car driven by Viduya struck and killed pedestrian Rocco Borquez as Viduya was driving east on 112th Street in Adams…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Woellhaf v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. Masters v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. People v. AbiodunSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. People v. DunlapColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API