Legal Opinion
Gapanovich v. Komori Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 14, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
255 N.J. Super. 607 (1992)
605 A.2d 1120
MICHAEL S. GAPANOVICH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
KOMORI CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND KOMORI PRINTING MACHINERY CO., LTD., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 2, 1992.
Decided April 14, 1992.
Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN[1], BILDER and KEEFE.
Thomas M. Moore argued the cause for appellant (Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, attorneys; Thomas M. Moore, on the brief).
Anthony N. Gallina argued the cause for respondent (Anthony N. Gallina, on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by BILDER, J.A.D.
On this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Charles Gendler & Co. v. Telecom Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. Roussel Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- EOI Corp. v. Medical Marketing Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Quinn v. KeinickeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1996
- DCM GROUP, INC. v. RAINADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022