Legal Opinion

United States v. Christine Annemarie Lennon, Christine A. Lennon

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 16, 2004No. 02-4207PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHERTOFF, Circuit Judge.

Christine Lennon appeals a final judgment of conviction and sentence entered by the District Court. Lennon pled guilty to being “found in the United States, having knowingly and unlawfully re-entered the United States” in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2). Lennon claims that the District Court’s sentencing analysis violated her rights under the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto clause. In part, this analysis turns on defining the nature of the offense to which Lennon pled. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and, for the reasons that follow, we will…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. Sean Michael GrierCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Amy GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. FlemmingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Munoz-FrancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API