Legal Opinion

Egan v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1979No. L.A. 30747PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

24 Cal.3d 809 (1979)

598 P.2d 452

157 Cal. Rptr. 482

MICHAEL EGAN, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Docket No. L.A. 30747.

Supreme Court of California.

August 14, 1979.

COUNSEL

Pettit, Evers & Martin, Joseph W. Rogers, Jr., Robert J. Heil, Ferguson, Hoffman, Henn & Mandel, Kaplan, Livingston, Goodwin, Berkowitz & Selvin, Herman F. Selvin, Sheldon W. Presser, Peter C. Bronson, Poindexter & Doutre, Alfred B. Doutre and Robert A. Seligson for Defendants and Appellants.

Beardsley, Hufstedler & Kemble, Seth M. Hufstedler, Peter O. Israel,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keshish v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
  2. Gutowitz v. Transamerica Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
  3. Cross v. American International GroupDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. The Sunset Landmark Investment, LLC v. Chubb Custom Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API