Legal Opinion

Ball v. United States

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided September 30, 1985No. CIV-2-85-346PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER AND DIRECTION

NEESE, District Judge.

Mr. Jay V. Ball, a prisoner in custody under sentence of this Court of July 15, 1981 in United States of America, plaintiff, v. Jay Ball, defendant, no. CR-2-81-9, moved the Court to vacate such sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and his motion has been presented to the undersigned for preliminary consideration under Rule 4, Rules — § 2255 Proceedings. Upon such consideration, it is concluded that it appears plainly from the face of the motion and the annexed exhibits and the prior proceedings that the movant is not entitled to relief…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. Docter, Docter & Salus, P.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Hunnewell v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API