Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. Docter, Docter & Salus, P.C.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 13, 1990No. 89-1049PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
This case is before us on a motion to dismiss an appeal. We must decide whether a notice of appeal timely filed but without a filing fee and requisite number of copies, as required by Super.Ct.Civ.R. 202 and D.C.App.R. 3(a), should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Appellants sought appeal from the trial court’s order of June 26, 1989, awarding appellee, Docter, Docter & Salus, P.C., legal fees. On July 22, 1989, appellants’ counsel mailed a notice of appeal to the Clerk of the Superior Court and served a copy upon counsel for appellee. Upon receipt on July 24, 1989, the Clerk rejected…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Parissi v. Telechron, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Gee v. Tenneco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- In re C. I. T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Norman Rothman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Neill v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Alfred L. Stone v. Landis Construction Company, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Calhoun v. WACKENHUT SERVICESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re J.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.