Pankewicz v. Jess
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Mateo County. George H Buck, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action for damages for false imprisonment. The amended complaint alleges that Clara A. Jess was the recorder of Daly City; that the defendant J. H. Mansfield was the sheriff of San Mateo County, and that the American Bonding Company was surety on the bond of said sheriff. The complaint further alleges that on a certain date Clara A. Jess, as recorder, adjudged the plaintiff guilty of contempt of court, in that he, as marshal of Daly City, willfully and unlawfully neglected and refused to serve a warrant issued by the recorder’s court in a certain criminal case, in which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thompson v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Barker v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Brichman v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Barfield v. . TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. WeitzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Burlingame v. TraegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Barrier v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Herndon v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Allen v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.