Legal Opinion
State v. Tietsort
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 2007No. 32166PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
This appeal challenges the district court’s denial of Reggie Tietsort’s motion to suppress evidence that was found at his residence before and after the issuance of a search warrant. The principal inquiry is whether the warrant was invalid as the product of prior unlawful searches. We vacate the district court’s order denying Tietsort’s motion and remand for further fact-finding.
I
FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In November 2004, detectives Sarrazolla and Furniss of the Garden City Police Department were investigating the theft of a blue Pontiac. They had received a tip that the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Howard -Motion to suppressIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. Dennis Earl HiebertIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. Kenneth Randall SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
- Bobeck v. Idaho Transportation DepartmentIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.