Legal Opinion

Curtman v. Piezuch

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1973No. 34933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMEONE, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants, Wendell and Betty Curtman, brought this action to establish a private road, pursuant to Sec. 228.340, RS Mo 1969, V.A.M.S., over the land owned by defendant-respondent, Raymond Pie-zuch. After a hearing the trial court found the issues in favor of the defendant-respondent, Piezuch, and found that the evidence did not sustain the petition for the establishment of a private road as prayed for. Judgment was entered accordingly. The Curtmans appealed. We affirm.

In order to obtain a clearer picture of the facts a brief description of the various tracts may be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vossen v. DautelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Miller v. BerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Evans v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. Welch v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  5. Wiese v. ThienSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hill v. Kennoy, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. Higginbotham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Sutter v. SimsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Hollars v. Church of God of the Apostolic Faith, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. State Highway Commission v. Fairmont Foods Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API