Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JUSTICE LAMB.
In this appeal we are asked to answer the following questions: does a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) have the authority to determine paternity in a proceeding under the Workers’ Compensation Act1 (Act) and, if so, what evidentiary standard must be met in order to prove paternity?2 For the reasons that follow, we hold that a WCJ does have the authority to determine paternity, not for all purposes, but for purposes of determining the eligibility of a child for benefits and that such eligibility must be established by a preponderance of the evidence. Because Appellee…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Cairgle v. AMERICAN R. AND SS CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McNeil v. JordanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Jeanes Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Hendricks v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Carmelo v. Mickletz (In re Mickletz)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Bingnear v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.