Legal Opinion

V.L-S. v. M.S.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2011No. DA 11-0231PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶1 M.S. (Father) appeals the First Judicial District Court’s order requiring him to provide support for his disabled adult twin sons. We *97consider on appeal whether §40-6-214, MCA, grants authority for the District Court’s ruling.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

¶2 M.A.S. and C.M.S. are the twin children of Father and V.L-S. (Mother), who divorced when the twins were eight years old. Now twenty-two years old, the twins were born with significant physical and mental disabilities and require full-time care and supervision. C.M.S. is legally blind, does not speak, cannot walk independently, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Paxton v. PaxtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Arche v. United StatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  3. In re M.N.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Emmerson v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Feinberg v. DiamantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. North Pacific Insurance v. StuckyMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Matter of D.D., YINCMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Matter of M.A.S and C.M.S.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. North Pacific Insurance v. StuckyMontana Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API