V.L-S. v. M.S.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker
¶1 M.S. (Father) appeals the First Judicial District Court’s order requiring him to provide support for his disabled adult twin sons. We *97consider on appeal whether §40-6-214, MCA, grants authority for the District Court’s ruling.
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
¶2 M.A.S. and C.M.S. are the twin children of Father and V.L-S. (Mother), who divorced when the twins were eight years old. Now twenty-two years old, the twins were born with significant physical and mental disabilities and require full-time care and supervision. C.M.S. is legally blind, does not speak, cannot walk independently, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Paxton v. PaxtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Arche v. United StatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- In re M.N.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
- Emmerson v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Feinberg v. DiamantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- North Pacific Insurance v. StuckyMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Matter of D.D., YINCMontana Supreme Court · 2020
- Matter of M.A.S and C.M.S.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
- North Pacific Insurance v. StuckyMontana Supreme Court · 2014