Legal Opinion

Center for Food Safety v. Johanns

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided September 1, 2006No. Civ.03-00621 JMS/BMKPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1

J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

From 2001 to 2003, four companies— ProdiGene, Monsanto, Hawaii Agriculture Research Center (HARC), and Garst Seed — planted corn and sugarcane that had been genetically modified to produce experimental pharmaceutical products. The companies modified the genetic structure of the corn or sugarcane so that, when harvested, the plants would contain hormones, vaccines, or…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alika Atay v. County of MauiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. OttDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
  3. Earth Island Inst. v. ElliottDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  4. International Center for Technology Assessment v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  5. US Citrus Sci. Council v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.District Court, E.D. California · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API