Legal Opinion

Cherry-El v. Martin

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 26, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-3456Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DWANE CHERRY-EL, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-3456 (RDM) v. SABRINA MARTIN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Sabrina Martin and Arturo Vazquez, whom he describes as “manager[s]” of what the Court understands to be Plaintiff’s place of employment. Dkt. 1 at 1–2 (Compl.). The Complaint contains little to no factual detail. Plaintiff alleges that his claim arises under the “Civil Rights Act of 1965,” Dkt. 1 at 3, and he alleges as follows: “From the [beginning,] the manager…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Dewey Baker v. Director, United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  4. Achagzai v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  5. Strunk v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API