Legal Opinion
Strunk v. Obama
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 5, 2011No. Civil Action No. 10-486PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is Christopher-Earl Strunk’s complaint [1] seeking to supplement the complaint filed in Taitz v. Obama, 707 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C.2010). Upon consideration of the complaint and the applicable law, the Court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice for the reasons set forth below.
I. LEGAL STANDARDS
A. Nature of Strunk’s Filing
Strunk styles his filing as an “Interpleader Verified Complaint” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 22. He seeks to supplement the complaint filed in Taitz v. Obama, 707 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C.2010), with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Briscoe v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Fontaine v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Thomas v. WilkinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- City of El Paso and John F. Cook, in His Official Capacity as Mayor of El Paso v. Tom Brown Ministries, Word of Life Church of El Paso, Tom Brown, El Pasoans for Traditional Family Values and Ben Mendoza, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2016
- Alter v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.