Legal Opinion

People v. Ramirez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 2010No. 207 SSM 40PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s argument, the Appellate Division properly concluded that the verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a reasonable jury could have inferred that defendant constructively possessed the drugs and drug paraphernalia located in an apartment in which defendant himself was found (see generally People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]).

Moreover, although the record is silent as to whether Supreme Court showed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. People v. StarlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. KadarkoNew York Court of Appeals · 2010

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. The People v.Kenneth NealonNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. The People v. Terrance L. MackNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. People v. AlcideNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. People v. GerraraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API