Legal Opinion

The People v.Kenneth Nealon

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 2015No. 133PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Fahey, J.

On this appeal, we are asked to decide whether a trial court commits a mode of proceedings error when the court fails to discuss a substantive jury note with counsel outside the presence of the jury, but reads the note into the record in the presence of the parties, counsel, and the jury before providing a response. While that departure from the O’Rama procedure (see People v O’Rama, 78 NY2d 270, 277-278 [1991]) is generally error, our precedent compels the conclusion that it is not a mode of proceedings error, and the preservation rule therefore applies.

L

In…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. StarlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. KisoonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. People v. TabbNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. People v. AlcideNew York Court of Appeals · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. The People v. Terrance L. MackNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. The People v. Shane MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  5. People v. MorrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 2018

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API