The People v.Kenneth Nealon
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Fahey, J.
On this appeal, we are asked to decide whether a trial court commits a mode of proceedings error when the court fails to discuss a substantive jury note with counsel outside the presence of the jury, but reads the note into the record in the presence of the parties, counsel, and the jury before providing a response. While that departure from the O’Rama procedure (see People v O’Rama, 78 NY2d 270, 277-278 [1991]) is generally error, our precedent compels the conclusion that it is not a mode of proceedings error, and the preservation rule therefore applies.
L
In…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. StarlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. KisoonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. TabbNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. AlcideNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- The People v. Terrance L. MackNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
- The People v. Shane MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. MorrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.