Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Domes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 22, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 5, 1997, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Claimant challenges the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which ruled that he was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was a principal in his wife’s landscaping and tree farm businesses. While we recognize that the determination of whether a claimant is totally unemployed is a factual question for the Board to resolve (see, Matter of Ferber…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FerberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re the Claim of MasfererAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of VargasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re PetosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re the Claim of RamdeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. In re FowlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. In re the Claim of AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API