Legal Opinion
In re Petosa
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 1, 2005No. Claim No. 1; Claim No. 2PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 2, 2004, which, inter alia, ruled that claimants were ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because they were not totally unemployed.
Claimants challenge decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that they were ineligible to receive benefits because they were not totally unemployed, charging them with recoverable overpayments of benefits and reducing their right to receive future earnings based upon findings that they made willful misrepresentations to obtain benefits.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of FalcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of FerberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Claim of DomesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of MasciopintoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Claim of Moreira-BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of LawrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007