Legal Opinion
Deines v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided November 28, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 88-2052-OPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EARL E. O’CONNOR, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the motion of defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter “Liberty Mutual”) for summary judgment. Plaintiff Robert E. Deines (hereinafter “Deines”) contends that Liberty Mutual is liable because the insurer failed to inspect, advise, and counsel co-defendant Vermeer Manufacturing Company (hereinafter “Vermeer Manufacturing”) that the company designed and manufactured a defective hay baler. Deines premises the alleged liability of Vermeer Manufacturing on section 324A of the Restatement (Second)…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dow Chemical Co. v. MahlumNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. City of Pittsburg, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Murphy v. Sentry InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Messer v. Amway Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Novak v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.