Legal Opinion

United States v. Jones

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided November 19, 1990No. ACM S28166 (reh)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION UPON REHEARING

LEONARD, Senior Judge:

In our first consideration of appellant’s case we affirmed findings of guilty to the offense of wrongful use of hashish; however, because of improper trial counsel sentencing argument, we set aside his sentence. United States v. Jones, 30 M.J. 898 (A.F.C.M.R.1990). A rehearing on sentence has been held and the case is before us again with appellant asserting two errors. We find no merit in either assertion.

First, appellant maintains that the military judge erred in refusing to give a defense instruction * that members would be allowed to reconsider…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waller v. SwiftUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. KelleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  4. United States v. JonesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. HarperU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. TurnerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API