Legal Opinion

Soghomonian v. United States

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 29, 2003No. CV F 99-5773 AWU DKBPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ISHII, District Judge.

In this case, plaintiffs are Raffi Sogho-monian (“Raffi”) and Deborah Garabedian (“Deborah”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”). They have sued defendants the United States and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity”), and Trans Union LLC (“Trans Union”) (collectively “Defendants”).

The only remaining defendant in this action, Trans Union, has moved for summary judgment on the only remaining claim — Plaintiffs eighth claim for relief against Trans Union under the federal Fair…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Renie Guimond v. Trans Union Credit Information CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Jennifer Cushman v. Trans Union CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Wiggins v. Equifax Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wright v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  2. Neclerio v. Trans Union, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
  3. Ashby v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2008
  4. Centuori v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2006
  5. Complot v. Truist BankDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API