Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Salvation Army

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1976No. 48559PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice:

Petitioners, hereafter respondents, have brought this proceeding to vacate an order awarding compensation, modified and affirmed on en banc appeal, and to dismiss the claim. No jurisdictional or evidentiary issues concerning employment, accidental injury, or cause and extent of disability are involved.

Claimant was engaged in non-hazardous employment operated by respondent. This organization carried Workmen’s Compensation coverage, however, and claimant’s salary was included in calculation of premium base. No signs on the premises advised employees of compensation coverage,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. County of Harris v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. Sisler v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Barton v. Oklahoma, K. & M. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Deshazer v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Danzie v. RutlandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Uptegraft v. Dome Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Prettyman v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Keeney v. TTC Illinois, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Thrasher v. Act-Fast Labor Pool, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Tomlinson v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API