Legal Opinion

Tomlinson v. Continental Casualty Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 2, 2003No. 99,040PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

KENNETH L. BUETTNER, Judge:

T1 Intervenor/Appellant Transcontinental Insurance Company (Transcontinental) appeals from the trial court's order which denied Transcontinental's Motion for Summary Judgment and granted the Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff/Appel-lee Jeffrey M. Tomlinson. The summary judgment denied Transcontinental's quest to be reimbursed for workers' compensation benefits paid to Tomlinson after Tomlinson received an amount greater than the workers' compensation benefits in a settlement with a third-party tortfeasor. Because we find that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parkhill Truck Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. ACCOSIF v. American States Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Equity Fire & Casualty Co. v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Podgurski v. OneBeacon InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Talbot v. WMK-Davis, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Miller Truck Lines, LLC. v. Central Refrigerated Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2011
  3. Southerland v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Talbot v. WMK-Davis, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API