United States v. An Undetermined Quantity of an Article of Drug Labeled as Benylin Cough Syrup
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
This case is one in which both parties appear to have committed misconduct grievous enough under ordinary circumstances to justify judgment for their opponent. In violation of an injunction entered by a federal district judge in Michigan, the Government persisted in an effort under 21 U.S.C. § 334, an in rem proceeding, to condemn $30,000 worth of Benylin Cough Syrup manufactured and owned by appellant Parke, Davis & Company. Although Parke, Davis was given notice of the Government’s action, it declined to appear in the proceedings. During a status call in the condemnation action on April 15,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Cessna Finance Corporation v. Bielenberg Masonry Contracting, Inc., Paul BielenbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- C.K.S. Engineers, Inc. v. White Mountain Gypsum Company, M.S. Riddle and Eryl A. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Stanislaw Opoka v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Textile Banking Company, Inc. v. William H. Rentschler, Appeal of Sarah Y. Rentschler Mittendorf, Citation-Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Inryco, Inc. v. Metropolitan Engineering Company, Inc., and American Fidelity Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.