Legal Opinion

Teter v. Clayton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7166PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Partition of lands.

It appeared in this case that George II. Teter died about the year 1863, seized of certain lands in Hamilton county, leaving his wife, Hannah A. Teter, surviving him; and that the land in this suit, being apart of the lands of which George II. died seized, was set off to said Hannah A. as her share thereof as such widow, in certain proceedings in partition. After the decease of her former husband, Hannah A. Teter married William H. Clayton, and died during this covei’ture, leaving as her sole heir by the former marriage the appellant, John H. Teter, and a child by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Longlois v. LongloisIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Niblack v. GoodmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Greencastle Southern Turnpike Co. v. State ex rel. MalotIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Waugh v. RileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Heavenridge v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Teter v. TeterIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. McNutt v. McNuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Avery v. AkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Luntz v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Elston v. PiggottIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API