Legal Opinion

Hill, Receiver v. Caldarera

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 6, 1939No. 4-5365PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrieeiN Smith, C. J.

The question is whether a receiver for an insolvent foreign corporation is entitled to certain funds in preference to an attaching creditor.

Stipulation of counsel shows issuance to appellees of a policy of automobile liability insurance by Republic Underwriters; damages; adjudication of insolvency March 30, 1938, by a Texas district court and appointment of Curtis E. Hill'as receiver; appellees’ suit against Republic Underwriters, with garnishment of insurance company funds in a Little Rock bank; the bank’s answer showing $502.50 on deposit; appointment (by the Pulaski circuit court, April…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Willitts v. . WaiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Gilman v. KetchamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Catlin v. Wilcox Silver-Plate Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Smead v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  5. Hunt v. Columbian Ins.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1867

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001
  2. Thomas, Patrick Jermaine v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API