Legal Opinion

Haug v. Gillett

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1875PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Shawnee District Court. Gillett-had judgment against Haug at the June Term 1873 of the district court, and Haug brings the case here on error. The facts and proceedings are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

*141The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This action was originally brought by defendant in error before a justice of the peace, to secure a money judgment against the plaintiff in error on an accepted draft and a promissory note. The plaintiff in error answered by admitting that he accepted the draft, and made the note, but claimed that they were both without consideration, being for intoxicating liquors sold on credit; that the contracts under which the liquors were sold were made in the city of Topeka, and that the defendant in error (Gillett) had no license at that time from…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WeissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. McCarty v. GordonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. State v. LydickNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Wagner v. BreedNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Gillen v. RileyNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API