Legal Opinion

McMahon v. Constantino

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided July 26, 2001No. 2446Published

1Opinion of the Court

QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO, J.,

INTRODUCTION

Dawn McMahon and James McMahon, plaintiffs, argue on appeal that the preliminary objection challenging venue and requesting a transfer of the case to Bucks County, filed by George Constantino M.D., and C.V. Surgical Associates PC., defendants, was erroneously sustained. This motion judge disagrees.

RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This motion judge carefully reviewed the pleadings, exhibits, and the memorandum filed in this matter. Briefly, the factual and procedural record defined by these pleadings, is as follows:

“Plaintiffs Dawn and James McMahon,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Purcell v. Bryn Mawr HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Fisher v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Kubik v. Route 252, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Masel v. GlassmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Shears v. RigleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API