McMahon v. Constantino
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO, J.,
INTRODUCTION
Dawn McMahon and James McMahon, plaintiffs, argue on appeal that the preliminary objection challenging venue and requesting a transfer of the case to Bucks County, filed by George Constantino M.D., and C.V. Surgical Associates PC., defendants, was erroneously sustained. This motion judge disagrees.
RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This motion judge carefully reviewed the pleadings, exhibits, and the memorandum filed in this matter. Briefly, the factual and procedural record defined by these pleadings, is as follows:
“Plaintiffs Dawn and James McMahon,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Purcell v. Bryn Mawr HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Fisher v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Kubik v. Route 252, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Masel v. GlassmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Shears v. RigleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.